Ethical Dilemmas for Journal of Kidney Diseases- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theEthical Dilemmas for Journal of Kidney Diseases. Answer: The present case is based on the ethical issues cropped up in the workplaces. Ethics means certain rules that are to be maintained by all to avoid certain conflictions. In the present case, it has been mentioned that the manager of Courtney had taken all the credits (Beach 2014). Taking the credits for others work is an ethical problem as it is opposed the principle of fair treatment or justice. It has been mentioned under the Code of Ethics that the person who takes credit for the acts of the other, deprives the real performer and violate the rules of ethics (Ferrell and Fraedrich 2015). It has been stated by Karen Dillon that the employee must opposed the misconduct and make the manager realise that he has done an unethical work. The employee can talk to the higher authority regarding the same. Steven Mintz has stated that taking credit for others is against the principle of moral justice and therefore, should be dealt with strict hand. The case of Harshal is based on the ethical dilemma regarding conflict of interest. The main theme of such ethical dilemma is that there should be two different kinds of issues, one is the primary and the other is secondary. Conflicts between the two occurs when the secondary interest affects the primary interest and it hampers the decision making power of the person. In this case, it has been observed that Harshal has two interests. The first one is to make a proposal regarding the analysis of skills of 10 employees and the second is to take interview as proposed by John, leader of the BA unit. It has been mentioned under the Code of Ethics that the conflict of interest can exploit the skilled ability of a person or employee for the corporal benefit (Engelbert, Mozafarpour and Paydary 2014). It can be resolved by way of identify whether the conflict is foreseeable for the job or not. If it provides the green nod, then it should be resolved as soon as possible. Mediation can also be a solution for the problem and it will help to get rid of the dilemma. The present case is based on the moral dilemma that has been faced by Kushlani in the workplace. It has been noticed that the company where she is working has proposed to manufacture certain plates and the official heads off the company are willing to complete the work with the help of the human but the work will create serious impacts on the employees and the doctors have confirmed that. This is also opposed the principle of Health and Safety Rules. On later occasion, the company manager decided to complete the project with the help of certain islander. Kushlani knows that the facts of the decision are illegal in nature. It has been mentioned that the person who faces the moral dilemma in the workplace should have to choose the legal option (Christensen et al. 2014). Thus Kushlani should opposed the immoral decision of the manager and inform the higher authority regarding the consequence of the decision. Reference: Beach, L.R., 2014.Decision making in the workplace: A unified perspective. Psychology Press. Christensen, J.F., Flexas, A., Calabrese, M., Gut, N.K. and Gomila, A., 2014. Moral judgment reloaded: a moral dilemma validation study.Frontiers in psychology,5. Engelbert, R.H., Mozafarpour, S. and Paydary, K., 2014. Conflict of interest.Iranian Journal of Kidney Diseases,8(3). Ferrell, O.C. and Fraedrich, J., 2015.Business ethics: Ethical decision making cases. Nelson Education.